Building Bigger And Stronger Rugby Players - The Sydney University Experiment

It is widely acknowledged that the average bodymass is a natural and not unintended by-product of
weight of rugby players has increased considerablysuch training.Another distinctive feature of Martin
over recent years. Less recognised is the extent toHarland's rugby training regimen is his requirement
which modern defensive alignments and strategiesthat backs undertake the same rigorous basic
have transformed rugby matches into contests ofstrength routines as forwards. Many strength and
attrition where bigger and stronger teams tend toconditioning coaches reserve the heavy "grunt" work
wear down their smaller and physically weakerfor forwards, or even restrict it to the tight
opponents over the course of a game. Perhaps thefive.Exposing backs to very serious weight training
most notable change has been the increasedhas produced a quite extraordinary outcome at
importance of physical dominance in theSydney University, as evidenced by comparing the
backline.Responding to this, Sydney University's rugbybody weights of their forwards and backs with those
club has been able to demonstrate that with the rightof the Wallabies and the four Australian Super 14
combination of coach and infrastructure, it is possiblefranchises, the ACT Brumbies, NSW Waratahs,
to fast track the physical development of playersQueensland Reds and Western Force.Not surprisingly,
outside a professional playing environment. In factthe University's young forwards are outweighed by
within a couple of seasons these players are able toeach of the five professional squads, 105.3 kilograms
achieve a body mass comparable to that ofcompared to 109.1 to 111.1 kilograms. However, in the
seasoned professionals together with a solidbacks the situation is reversed with the University
foundation of basic strength.In late May, Sydneyplayers averaging 95.1 kilograms as opposed to 90.9
University announced its team for the first round ofto 92.9 kilograms. Thus the Sydney University backs
the Tooheys New Cup, the premier competition inoutweigh Australia's national and provincial squads by
Sydney club rugby. All of the fifteen players are pastbetween 2.2 and 4.2 kilograms per man.If we look at
or current students who had been developedthe difference in body weight between backs and
through the Club's Colts and lower grade teams. Noneforwards it can be seen that for Sydney University it
of them are paid to play for the Club, although theaverages 10.2 kilograms, against 16.2 to 19.4 kilograms
eleven who are still students receive modestfor Australia's professional squads, a very substantial
scholarship assistance. Only three of the players aredifference.The Sydney University experiment seems
on professional contracts.It is instructive to compareto be providing clear evidence that the body weight
their body weight and age profiles with those ofof rugby backs can be dramatically increased through
squads from four major rugby countries, those ofserious weight training, but the question arises as to
Australia, England, New Zealand and South Africa. Thewhether this has benefits in terms of playing
average weight of the international teams variesperformance.One answer is that the other
from 101.2 to 102.9 kilograms while their average agestrength-oriented football code, American football,
is from 25.5 to 27.2 years. Comparative figures forhas traditionally used training methods similar to those
the Sydney University team are 100.5 kilograms andof Martin Harland. All players, whether linemen or
22.5 years.It can be seen that the part-time, unpaidrunning backs, are required to do heavy gym work.
Sydney University players, though three to fiveNo one would seriously suggest that their quick
years younger, weigh only a couple of kilograms lessplayers have inferior dynamic abilities to rugby
than the world's best players. This is quiteplayers.Another justification for building heavier backs
extraordinary as normally a much greater weightwith superior leg drive lies in the already mentioned
disparity would be expected.For the past three yearsimportance of physical dominance in the rugby
Sydney University Football Club has been operatingbackline. With the modern emphasis on structure and
an Elite Development Squad (EDS) program for itscoordination in defensive alignments, bigger and
top grade and colts players. Utilising one of the beststronger backs are better able to continually repel
equipped gymnasiums in Australian rugby, playersopposition attacks and also over the course of a
train for eleven months of the year and undertakegame are likely to create physical and mental fatigue
four weights sessions per week off-season and ain their counterparts.Having achieved a strong
lesser number while playing.The program's strengthfoundation of basic strength and greater body mass,
and conditioning components have been devised andMartin Harland is then able to focus on speed and
administered by Martin Harland, a sports scientist whoexplosiveness in his players. It is clear that the
has previously worked with professional rugbySydney University approach yields results on the
league, Australian football and basketball teams. Hisplaying field. 2005 was the Club's most successful
programs for rugby players place a high degree ofyear, winning the Sydney Club Championship, the First
emphasis on basic strength development andGrade Premiership and four lower grade
rugby-specific fitness. A distinguishing feature of hisPremierships.Even more importantly, players who
approach is a concentration on heavy lower bodygraduate from such a program are much better
work through exercises such as squats, deadlifts andequipped to withstand the rigours of modern
cleans. In addition, both backs and forwards makerugby.Bruce Ross is CEO of MyoQuip, manufacturers
intensive use of the MyoQuip ScrumTruk, aof variable-resistance strength machines including the
rugby-specific apparatus that targets the large massHipneeFlex and HipneeThrust, and the rugby-specific
leg extensor muscles, specifically the gluteal andScrumTruk and JumpTruk. MyoQuip exports
quadriceps groups. Hypertrophy or increased muscleworldwide from Australia.